Okay. It wasn’t murder. It was Robbery in the Second Degree – but it’s Yakima, Washington for crying out loud, not Chi-town. I’m not sure what I expected from being on jury duty, but it certainly surpassed my expectations. Yes, it’s my civic duty. I know that. I would like to maintain my status as a productive member of society, but if I’m going to be honest, it felt a little like murder each and every day of this two-week affliction.
Why did it suck? Let me count thy ways.
1. Unplanned, 2-week Sabbaticals are slightly “inconvenient”
Each and every day you must arrive at the courthouse at the appointed time. You, and 60 other “average” citizens are crammed into this holding room where you painfully wait. And wait. And wait. And then you take a “restroom” break. And then you are herded back into the room to hurry up and wait some more. About an hour and a half into this process, the bailiff finally arrives to randomly assign and arrange everyone in numerical order. The lower your number, the more likely you are to be selected as a member of the jury.
I did not know that. So, when I was labeled “Juror #4” I was beaming. I gloated a little. I thought to myself, “Suckas…I’m going to be out of here fast!” The bailiff informed us that we would be escorted into the courtroom and the judge would ask each and every one of us if it would be a burden to serve time on the jury.
Hell ya! Let’s see. I have a 6 year old that has to go to school at 8:30 and be picked up at 3 p.m. And I have a 4 year old that goes to school at 8:30 and picked up at noon. Oh, and did I mention I have a 2 year old who still craps his pants and requires constant supervision? Oh, and I am working part time and the ONLY event my organization sponsors each year happens to be THIS WEEK. And I’m the only employee. Does that sound slightly inconvenient? Sure, I would much rather sit in a chair all day and listen to a grown person justify why they felt it necessary to beat and rob someone…but I have shit to do!
Or, so I thought.
Apparently the judge on this case did not think that I would be inconvenienced by serving on this jury. Ergo…You can now call me “Juror #4.”
2. Is this what you call “A Jury of your Peers?”
Before the trial was to begin, the Prosecuting and Defense attorneys wanted to “get to know us a little better” so that they could eliminate a few potential jurors at will. All 60 of us were handed an identical questionnaire and one-by-one we had to take the microphone and answer the questions. It was pretty simple and straight forward, but my God, the answers were down right horrific. If I had a dollar for every time I heard this response…
Uh. I’m not married.
I’m currently unemployed.
I have a couple of kids, but none that live with me.
In my free-time, I like to play Poke Man and Wii.
I’m currently unemployed.
I have a couple of kids, but none that live with me.
In my free-time, I like to play Poke Man and Wii.
Dude, what the hell is Poke Man? In case you didn’t know…You are like 40 Years Old! Perhaps it is time to expand your “free-time” repertoire and hit the gym. Or see your kids. Or, rent a place of your own and get out of your parents basement. I don’t know. It’s just a thought.
This went on and on. I seriously doubted that they would be able to select any sort of “jury of your peers.” But then it hit me. It’s not my peers…It’s the scary Robber who attacks people’s peers. Maybe, just maybe, I will be eliminated in the final hours of this thing. Had I shown up like I usually look in the morning as a mom – wrinkled clothes, hat over my unwashed hair, and sans make-up – I may have looked like a peer. It would have made sense. But I looked good today! I had my hair did. I brought my “smart” looking brown leather Ralph Lauren brief case. I sported a really cute trendy little poncho. I had some bling on. Surely I would be dismissed in a heartbeat. I may have even passed for a conservative Republican. Apparently, I was wrong. They saw through my façade and pegged me as this Robber’s “peer.” Flattering for sure.
3. The Inefficiencies of our Judicial System are Mind-Numbing.
You know, the actual trial was quite interesting. All 45 minutes of it. But that 45 minutes of testimony – from exactly 3 people – spanned four days filled with numerous breaks, recesses, and side-bars. If you were told to be there at 9 a.m. you could bet your booty that you wouldn’t actually get into the courtroom until 10:45. Exactly one witness would be called to the stand, answer a few questions, and they would dismiss us for a “potty break.” We would return to the courtroom only to hear a few more minutes of testimony, and then we would break for our 1.5 hour lunch. We would return at 1:30, sit in the holding room for another hour, and maybe hear 30 more minutes of testimony only to be dismissed for another “potty break.” Jeesh. My four-year-old can hold his urine longer than this. Once we returned from this afternoon urine break, we would be almost immediately dismissed for the day and asked to return again tomorrow. Let me repeat. Three witnesses. 45 minutes of testimony - total. FOUR days.
4. Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems.
If that is true, than Jury Duty leaves you “problem-free.” Oh yes. You are paid for your time, service, and utter inconvenience. You are paid $10. No, not an hour. $10 a day. I can tell you right now that I spent more than that on lunch. In fact, I spent about $13.78 each day at Second Street Grill so I guess jury duty actually put me in the hole roughly $12 during my brief stint as Juror #4. At least I didn’t have mo’ problems!
5. Anything but Murder.
Once our three witnesses testified, and we heard the closing arguments, our Jury of 13 (12 jurors and 1 alternate), we were ushered into the deliberation room. Our alternate was excused to leave, we were given instructions from the judge, and the debate began. The first hour seemed harmless. 11 of us were in total agreement and ready to submit a verdict. But…there is always an outlier, and our outlier carried around her leisurely reading like a trophy. Here is a piece of advice. If you are EVER on a jury of 12 people, and one of them religiously brings the book “How to make an argument and WIN” – you are in deep doodoo - especially if your opinion squarely conflicts with hers.
We went round and round with our outlier. We approached it from so many angles.
Do you believe the suspect was at the scene of the crime?
Yes, I do.
Do you believe she assaulted the victim? (Insert 20 photos of a battered woman).
Yes, I do.
Do you believe she stole the property she was accused of stealing?
Yes, I do.
Do you believe she is guilty?
Yes, I do.
Than for God’s sake, what’s the problem lady?
Well, I just think there could have been some other people hiding in the basement who may have had some involvement.
But, even if there were 200 people hiding in the basement…they are not on trial. We only need to believe that the suspect was there and committed the crime.
But, what if there were other people who orchestrated the robbery?
See the same answer as above.
I thought to myself…we will never get out of here. Ever. This woman has one enormous imagination and it is going to hold us hostage forever – until I murder her. After four hours of this “deliberation” the outlier said she felt sick and needed to be dismissed from the jury. Okay. Interesting. Now what?
The bailiff was called in, heard that the juror wanted to be excused, and informed us that we would need to call our alternate back in and START OVER. Yes, you heard it folks. Start over. Don’t get me wrong. I love our country and our judicial process. I believe whole-heartedly that you are innocent until proven guilty (even when there are 20 photos and 3 witnesses). I believe, that as a juror, you should not compromise what you truly do not agree with because a person’s life is at stake. And even though all of these warm, fuzzy beliefs exist within me…
I still wanted to kill the #$!!#$%. But then I would be the one on trial.









